Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for committing dowry death of her daughterin-law with general allegations being mother-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R., marriage of Soni was solemnized with Azharuddin about 04 years back, who was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of Wagon R Car and Rs.5,00,000/- and was burnt to death on 30.8.2018; that as per post mortem report cause of death is due to asphyxia as a result of anti mortem thermal burns; that during trial first informant, his wife and nephew i.e. father, mother and cousin brother of deceased have been examined as P.W.1 to P.W.3, who in their statements on oath during cross examination have stated that marriage did take place about eight and half years back and deceased had two children aged above 07 years and and 04 years; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Wagon R Car and Rs.5,00,000/- allegedly demanded, as dowry; that case of applicant is distinguishable from husband of deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that she will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 28.9.2018.
