Allowed

Chhotu Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Mar 2019BAIL/5927/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted bail to applicants Chhotu Singh and Vivek Yadav in an case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, subject to strict conditions regarding attendance and undertaking not to seek adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Aplicants enlarged on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, subject to specific conditions including appearance and prohibition on adjournment.

Chhotu Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5927 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Chhotu Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that only one case has been shown against the applicants in the Gang Chart which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and in the said case, the applicants have been granted bail by the competent Court, the said fact has been mentioned in para 7 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicants are in jail since 16.01.2019.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, evidence complicity of the accused severity of punishment and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let the applicants- Chhotu Singh and Vivek Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 97 of 2018, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Balua, District Chandauli be enlarged on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two suretie, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-

¶10

(i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In

¶12

case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicants misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 6.3.2019 Arti

Chhotu Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Singh and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangasharan Vs State of U.P.

Meharban Vs State of U.P.

Javed Vs State of U.P.

Rinku Singh @ Bhan Singh Vs State of U.P.

Maikal Sonkar Vs State of U.P.

Parun Vs State of U.P.