Anuj v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge court allowed bail to the applicant in a criminal case under the U.P. Gangsters Act, setting specific conditions regarding court attendance, avoiding adjournments, and potential consequences for misuse of bail liberty.
What did the court decide?
Enlarged the applicant on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties of Rs. Two Lacs each, subject to conditions of court appearance.
What the court decided
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5222 of 2019
Applicant :- Anuj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Yadvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Yadvendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that five cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court, the said fact has been mentioned in para 5 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicant is in jail since 19.06.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 evidence complicity of the accused severity of punishment and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant- Anuj involved in Case Crime No. 1089 of 2018, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Etah be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties (Rs. Two Lacs each) (One should be of a family member) , each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in cases under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anuj
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/5222/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court