The single judge granted bail to the applicant, Sumit Yadav, in a criminal miscellaneous application. The applicant was involved in six cases including the present one. The court imposed a personal bond and two sureties.
Applicant released on bail by furnishing personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50796 of 2019
Applicant :- Sumit Yadav @ Monu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tej Pratap Singh,Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. Showing the arrest of the applicant in case crime no. 166 of 2019, six cases have also been planted against the applicant including this case. The applicant has not committed the alleged offence. There is no cogent evidence against the applicant to connect with the alleged offence. Neither the applicant has prepared the adulterated liquor nor he sold the same. The co-accused Upendra @ Rinku, Ramu Parihar, Yogendra have already been released on bail by another bench of this court and by this court vide orders dated 6.12.2019, 28.12.2019 and 26.12.2019 in Cr.Misc. Bail Application Nos. 54235 of 2019, 52552 of 2019 and 49674 of 2019 respectively, therefore, applicant is also entitled for bail. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragaph nos. 10 and 11 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicant is in jail since 3.4.2019.
Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Having given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Sumit Yadav @ Monu involved in Case Crime No. 214 of 2019, under Section 304 and 272 IPC and section 60 (A) Excise Act, Police Station Ghatampur District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 Gss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail in the instant case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sumit Yadav @ Monu
Bachchoo Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
