Allowed

Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Mar 2019BAIL/5008/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge court granted bail to the female applicant under the Cow Slaughter Act, ordering her release contingent on personal bond and sureties, emphasizing parity with co-accused who were similarly bailed despite the gravity of the charge and lack of opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act via personal bond and two sureties each.

Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5008 of 2019 Applicant :- Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar,Jitendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶4

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad learned AGA appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶5

It is contended that applicant is a Lady and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused persons namely Mahir and Sadakat having similar role has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 13.2.2019 and 8.2.2019 passed in in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 6200 and 5715 of 2019, copies of the said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 4.1.2019.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer without disputing the fact that co-accused has been granted bail.

¶7

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶8

Let applicant- Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 6 of 2019, under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act, Police StationKithor, District- Meerut, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶9

(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trail and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release.

¶10

(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶11

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶12

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.3.2019 ssm

Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Tamanna @ Kallo v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazim and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Anamulla @ Abdulla Vs State of U.P.

Naushad Vs State of U.P.

Monu Bansal Vs State of U.P.

Anvar Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Umar Vs State of U.P.