The applicant moved for anticipatory bail, which the court dismissed as infructuous because a charge-sheet had already been filed in the underlying investigation.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49877 of 2019
Applicant :- Appu Yadav @ Ravi Pratap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that after conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.11.2019 Vikas
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application has become infructuous after filing of charge-sheet.
Appu Yadav @ Ravi Pratap
Rajul Bhargava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
