It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the present F.I.R. has been lodged by the complainant against unknown persons wherein general allegations have been levelled against all the accused and no specific role is attributed to the applicant. It is further argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and his name has surfaced in the statement of the co-accused. No fracture has found in the body of the injured. Number of incised wounds and abrasions have been found. It is further argued that there are three persons alleged to have caused injuries. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further argued that the co-accused Rahil @ Shadik Raza has already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.09.2019 passed in Cri. Misc. Bail Application No. 39293 of 2019, copy of which order has been appended as Annexure no.4 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application. Accordingly, the applicant is also liable to be enlarged on bail. The applicant has no criminal history except the present case and is languishing in jail since 22.08.2019. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
