This court rejected a third bail application filed by Shakib in a criminal case involving serious offenses under the IPC. The judge held that no new grounds were shown compared to previously rejected applications and dismissed the plea due to the gravity of the allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40879 of 2018
Applicant :- Shakib Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- A.C.Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Irfanul Huda
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Mohd. Nadeem, learned A. G. A. for the State and Mr. Irfanul Huda, learned counsel for the complainant.
Applicant has moved the present third bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No.131 of 2016 u/s 147,148,149,452,323,504,506,307,302 IPC PS Kotwali District Meerut. The first and second bail applications were rejected by this Court vide orders dated 7.4.2017 and 29.3.2018 respectively.
Perusal of the record shows that no subsequent development or any new ground has been brought on record.
Moreover, looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 8.3.2019 SP
Shakib
Vipin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
