The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the first information report that is lodged by the mother of the prosecutrix after she had come back home, and the informant had all information about what had befallen her daughter, all that is said in the first information is that her daughter was taken away by the applicant on 09.04.2018 at 7:00 in the morning by blandishment. It is further said that she was able to recover her daughter privately with the assistance of natives in three days, and, has come to report the matter. In the FIR, it is pointed out that there is absolutely no case of the prosecutrix being ravished by the applicant. It is further pointed out that in the statement of the prosecutrix' mother recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., the only allegation against the applicant, is of enticing away the prosecutrix where no case of rape at all finds mention which would have been known to the prosecutrix's mother in case it were true. Likewise, in the statement of the prosecutrix's father, the allegation is of enticing away the prosecutrix and nothing said about rape. It is pointed out that it has figured in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. that the applicant after taking her away at knife point wanted to marry her, and attempted to do a court marriage at Gopalganj. It is further said both in the statements under Section 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. by the prosecutrix that she was ravished by the applicant while she was at Gopalganj. This fact is also mentioned by the prosecutrix in her statement made to the doctor in confidence during her medico legal examination, where it is said that she was ravished by the applicant. It is, however, pointed out that for the reasons best
