Farman v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a bail application filed by Farman challenged in connection with Crime No. 325 of 2019 involving cheating, forgery, and illegal liquor possession. The court found it to be a fit case for bail.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on executing a personal bond with two sureties subject to not tampering with evidence or witnesses and appearing for trial.
What the court decided
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35016 of 2019
Applicant :- Farman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Farman in connection with Case Crime No.325 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and 60/72 U.P. Excise Act, P.S. Tarya Sujan, District Kushi Nagar.
As per the first information report the applicant was arrested on 28.06.2019 along with the 500 petti of illegal liquor.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He further submitted that the alleged recovery shown from the applicant is totally fake and false. He submitted that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.06.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail in a case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and sections 60/72 of U.P. Excise Act.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Farman
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Ajit Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/35016/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court