Allowed

Bittu Giri v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Jan 2019BAIL/3400/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the applicant, Bittu Giri, in a murder case where an accused was killed by a sharp-edged weapon. The court noted that co-accused had already been released on bail, the applicant lacked criminal history, and prosecution failed to establish the applicant's role in the fatal head injury.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail to Bittu Giri on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Bittu Giri Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 50

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3400 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Bittu Giri Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Narendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Ladlee Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against nine accused persons, namely Mintoo Giri, Bittu Giri, Hridyanand Giri, Shatrughan Giri, Virendra Giri, Indu Devi, Nisha, Fulmati, Harindra alleging that on 8.9.2018 they assaulted Pintu Giri, Neelam, Fula, Guddi, Chandrabhan with sharp edged weapon and iron rod. Pintu received one head injury, resultantly died. Injuries received by the injured are not dangerous to life.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that coaccused namely Indu Devi, Phulmati and Harindra Giri have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 9.1.2019, 17.1.2019 and 21.1.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1129 of 2019, 2209 of 2019 and 2718 of 2019, since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There are general allegations against all accused persons. It is not clear from the prosecution case, who is the author of head injury due to which he died. There is no independent witness and no legal evidence against the applicant. Injuries received by the injured are simple in nature. Offences levelled against the applicant are not attracted in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 14.9.2018 (near about four and half months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history and the case of present applicant is identical to coaccused Indu Devi, Phulmati and Harindra Giri who have been enlarged on bail.

¶10

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of

¶11

custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

¶12

Let applicant Bittu Giri involved in Case Crime No. 359 of 2018 as well as Session Trial No. 635 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 304 IPC, Police Station Ramkola, District Kushinagar be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶13

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶14

2.The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶15

3.The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶16

4.The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶17

5.The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 24.1.2019 A. Singh

Bittu Giri v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bittu Giri v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hetam Singh Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Batham and Another Vs State of U.P.

Gauri Shankar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Alok Mishra Alias Santosh Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Pasu Vs State of U.P.

Rajan Singh Alias Rajjo Vs State of U.P.