Allowed

Anand Raj @ Nandan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Sept 2019BAIL/33938/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was heard in the absence of the applicant's counsel due to a strike, represented only by the applicant's father-in-law. Despite legal opposition, the court held it as a fit case for bail considering the nature of allegations and severity of punishment.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties with conditions to appear in court and not tamper with evidence.

Anand Raj @ Nandan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33938 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Anand Raj @ Nandan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

As there is strike of lawyers, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the bail application. However, Hridayananda Singh, father-in-law of the applicant, who is also pairokar of the affidavit accompanying the bail application has appeared in person.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Anand Raj @ Nandan in connection with Case Crime No.85 of 2019, under Sections 379, 411, 413, 417, 420 I.P.C., P.S. Bankata, District Deoria.

¶7

Heard Sri Hridayananda Singh, on behalf of the applicant in person and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

It has been argued that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that the alleged recovery shown from the applicant is totally fake and false. He submitted that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He submitted that all the offences are triable by the court of Magistrate. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.06.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Anand Raj @ Nandan involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶13

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶14

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶15

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

¶16

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Order Date :- 6.9.2019

¶18

R./

Anand Raj @ Nandan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Raj @ Nandan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baby Aksha Vs State of U.P.

Javed Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Pritam Singh Vs Gurmit Singh and Others

Jitendra Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Balram Singh Vs State of U.P.

Anand Raj @ Nandan Vs State of U.P.