It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is further argued that as per the allegations in the FIR, on information received by the informer, the police party raided on the spot and the applicant is said to have been arrested on the spot showing recovery of 174 gm. of 'Alprajolam Powder' and Rs. 1,00,000/- from the possession of the applicant. It is further argued that regarding recovery of Rs. 1,00,000/-, another F.I.R. was lodged in which the applicant has already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.08.2019 passed in Cri. Misc. Bail Application No. 32110 of 2019, copy of which order has been passed on to the Court today is kept on record. It is next submitted that the recovery shown by the Police is false and planted and is not supported by any independent witness. It is next submitted that there is no compliance of Section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act. The applicant has criminal history of one case in which he has already been granted bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.06.2019. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
