Allowed

Irshad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Oct 2019BAIL/32683/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the bail application of an accused charged under the N.D.P.S. Act. After hearing the applicants and the State and considering the facts and circumstances, the applicant was released on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail in Crime No.268 of 2019 upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties subject to conditions.

Irshad Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32683 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Irshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.

¶6

Accused-applicant, involved in Case Crime No.268 of 2019, under Section 21/22 N.D.P.S Act, Police Station Kotwali Hathras, District Hathras, applied for bail.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Alleged recovery is false and fake. It is further submitted that mandatory provision of N.D.P.S. Act has not been complied with at the time of alleged recovery. No public witness was taken at the time of recovery. Applicant is in jail since 11.07.2019. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that applicant has been arrested with the possession of 550 gm Diazepam for which he had no valid license.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, rival contention of learned counsel for the parties, detention of applicant in jail, severity of punishment in case of conviction, alleged recovery from the possession of the accused-applicant and without commenting upon the merit of the case, applicant deserves bail.

¶10

Accordingly, bail application is allowed .

¶11

Let applicant Irshad be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties and filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten

¶13

the witnesses.

¶14

The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.

¶15

During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities or case.

¶16

In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶17

Order Date :- 1.10.2019 I.A.Siddiqui

Irshad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Irshad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vaishar Vs State of U.P.

Veer Bahadur Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sahibey Alam Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Shamshad Vs State of U.P.

Subhan Vs State of U.P.