Allowed

Manoj Bhati v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Aug 2019BAIL/32447/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge entertained a bail application filed by Manoj Bhati under specific IPC sections. Without expressing an opinion on merits, the court found it a fit case for bail considering the evidence and gravity. The application was allowed with conditions including execution of a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on bail by executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties.

Manoj Bhati Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32447 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Manoj Bhati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Manoj Bhati in connection with Case Crime No.940 of 2018, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Sadar bazar, District Agra.

¶7

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that there is allegation in the first information report that the applicant has cheated the complainant for providing the loan to the complainant for the purchase of a car. He submitted that certain money was taken from the complainant by the applicant and the car was given to him through Max Auto Limited. He further submitted that there seems to be some dispute between the applicant and the complainant over the sharing of brokerage money. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.10.2018 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶9

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶10

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Manoj Bhati involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶13

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶14

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶15

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶16

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts

¶17

to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 20.8.2019

¶18

R./

Manoj Bhati v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Bhati v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nityanand Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Kalu @ Alam Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Batham Vs State of U.P.

Niraj Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Sunny Vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Kori Vs State of U.P.