Allowed

Sazid v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Sept 2019BAIL/32361/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under the Cow Slaughter Act, the High Court allowed the release of the applicant on a personal bond and two sureties. The court acknowledged the severity of punishment but found the applicant merited bail, subject to standard conditions preventing tampering and ensuring cooperation with the trial.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties and filing an undertaking subject to conditions.

Sazid Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32361 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Sazid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.

¶6

Accused-applicant, involved in Case Crime No. 336 of 2016, under Section 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act,1955 Police Station Kithore, District Meerut applied for bail.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of enmity for the purpose of harassment. Applicant committed no offence. A false and fabricated story has been set up by the police. Alleged recovery is false and fake. Applicant is in jail since 12.06.2019. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Alleged offence is triable by Magistrate.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that 5-6 quintal Kg. boven meat has been recovered from the house of co-accused Nanhe.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, rival contention of learned counsel for the parties, detention of applicant in jail, severity of punishment in case of conviction, alleged recovery from the possession of the applicant and without commenting upon the merit of the case, applicant deserves bail.

¶10

Accordingly, bail application is allowed .

¶11

Let applicant-Sazid be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties and filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶13

The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.

¶14

During trial, applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activities or case.

¶15

In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶16

Order Date :- 30.9.2019 Akram

Sazid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sazid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mateen Vs State of U.P.

Sitaram Vs State of U.P.

Ashif Qureshi Vs State of U.P.

Vaishar Vs State of U.P.

Veer Bahadur Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sahibey Alam Vs State of U.P.