Allowed

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Feb 2019BAIL/3078/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed bail to the applicant, Pramod Kumar, who was falsely implicated and detained since November 2018. No credible evidence connects him to offences under the IPC and NI Act. The Court expressed reasonable apprehension of tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed. Applicant directed to be released on personal bond and two sureties of equal amount.

Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Corruption | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 44

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3078 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.

¶6

Contention raised on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is not named in the first information report. He has no role to play in the commission of the offence. No offence has been committed by the applicant. There is no credible evidence appearing against the applicant to connect him with the alleged offence. In case the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant does not bear any criminal history and is languishing in jail since 29.11.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail. However, learned A.G.A. has not disputed the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Pramod Kumar involved in Case Crime No.1892 of 2018, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., 66 of I.T. Act, 2008, Police Station Sector 20, NOIDA, District Gautam Bugh Nagar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶10

Order Date :- 20.2.2019

¶11

rkg

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu @ Vaibhav Vs State of U.P.

Ravi Pandey Vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Bhagwat Saini Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Nasir Vs State of U.P.

Shanu @ Nazim Vs State of U.P.