Shyam Sunder Musahar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
What the court decided
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2970 of 2019
Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Musahar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.B.Pal,Umesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 325 of 2017, under Sections 354 I.P.C. and under Section 7/8 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offence Act (POCSO Act)-2012, Police Station Kotwali, District Deoria with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the alleged incident has been shown of 09.05.2017 at 12.00 P.M. but the FIR has been lodged on 20.05.2017 at 11.15 A.M. and that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It was pointed out that as per medical examination report, the victim girl has not sustained any injury and that mere allegation against the applicant is that he torn the clothes of victim girl with intention to molest her. It was further submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 09.10.2018, having no criminal history. It was further submitted that in case applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable under Sections 354 IPC and POCSO Act-2012 considering prima facie case.
Whether the delay between incident FIR lodging and lack of injuries justify bail in a false implication scenario.
Whether conditions regarding non-interference with victims and evidence are sufficient for release.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shyam Sunder Musahar
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2970/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court