Soyab v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed bail application for applicant Soyab in a cheating case under Sections 413, 414 IPC, granting release subject to bond and sureties.
What did the court decide?
Applicant Soyab released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties with conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29218 of 2019
Applicant :- Soyab Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shanti Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Soyab in connection with Case Crime No.130 of 2019, under Sections 413, 414 I.P.C., P.S. Simmbhawali, District Hapur.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that the alleged recovery shown from the possession of the applicant is totally fake and false. He submitted that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 03.06.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant Soyab is entitled to bail in case Crime No.130 of 2019 under Sections 413, 414 I.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Soyab
Coram
Ajit Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29218/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court