Allowed

Harun v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2019BAIL/28364/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the High Court decided to release the applicant on bail subject to specific conditions including furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the innocence or guilt allegations.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties each in like amount subject to specific conditions.

Harun Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28364 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Harun Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Mr. Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. Seema Shukla, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the alleged recovery of 20 Kgs of beef is false, fabricated and concocted. In fact, no such recovery was effected from the possession of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has no concern with the alleged recovery. There is no public witness of the alleged recovery. It is next contended that there are no chances of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the prosecution evidence.The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.05.2019. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Having considered the submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Harun, involved in case crime No. 439 of 2019, under sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act PS Deoband, District Saharanpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶13

Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Sazia

Harun v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harun v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Mukesh Vs State of U.P.

Rahees Vs State of U.P.

Sri Krishna Vs State of U.P.

Aadil Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Subhan Vs State of U.P.