It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next argued that the applicant has not been arrested on the spot nor any recovery has been made either on his pointing out or from his possession. It is next argued that the co-accused persons, namely, Sony @ Kamarjahan and Shameem Meb, who were caught on the spot and recovery of one lac was made from them, have already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide orders dated 15.04.2019 and 18.04.2019 passed in Cri. Misc. Bail Application Nos. 15535 of 2019 and 2441 of 2019, respectively, copy of which orders have been appended as Annexure no. 6 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application and the case of the applicant stands on better footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 13.04.2019. The applicant does not have any previous criminal history. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
