Allowed

Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2019BAIL/28011/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application filed by an applicant charged with offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. The court released the applicant on bail under a personal bond and sureties, subject to specific conditions including attendance at trial and no tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, subject to conditions of attending trial, not tampering with witnesses, and not indulging in illegal activities.

Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28011 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Harindra Pratap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant in the Court today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 160 of 2019, under Sections 392 and 411 I.P.C., P.S. Tronica City, district-Ghaziabad, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He next submitted that no incriminating article or material has been recovered either from the applicant or on his pointing out. The recovery which has been shown from the applicant was false one. There is no public witness of the alleged recovery. No identification parade was conducted. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 25.2.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of

¶11

learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶12

Let the applicant, Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 160 of 2019, under Sections 392 and 411 I.P.C., P.S. Tronica City, district-Ghaziabad subject to the following conditions:-

¶13

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶14

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶15

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶16

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 15.7.2019 Faridul

Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ateeqarrhaman Alias Jagga v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Bahadur Singh Vs State of U.P.

Bhola Vs State of U.P.

Praveen Vs State of U.P.

Keshav Goel Vs State of U.P.