Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being Nanad of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged by Hemendra Kumar on 27.7.2018, his sister Geeta was married to co-accused Raj Kapoor on 22.4.2015 and since after marriage, she was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of Maruti Car, as dowry and on 26.7.2018 at 2:35, she called first informant that her in-laws are putting pressure for cost of Maruti Car and he assured to come after father gets well and on 26.7.2018 at about 11:00 p.m., dead body of his sister Geeta was kept in her sasural; that applicant is a married Nanad of deceased; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Maruti Car, allegedly demanded, as dowry; that post mortem report states that deceased died due to asphyxia as a result of anti mortem hanging; that deceased was not blessed with a child during three and half years of marriage and there may be differences between husband and wife, in furtherance of above differences, deceased may have committed suicide; that co-accused Khushi @ Rubi and Urvashi unmarried sisters of applicant, have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide orders dated 30.11.2018 and 14.12.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.45564 of 2018 and 47953 of 2018, copies of which have been produced for perusal and taken on record; that case of applicant is distinguishable from Raj Kapoor, husband of deceased; that applicant is not a previous convict; that applicant undertakes that she will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 30.8.2018.
