Allowed

Ravi v. State of Up

Allahabad HC8 Jul 2019BAIL/23828/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was disposed of allowing the release of the applicant, Ravi, who was accused of offences under the Arms Act, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, and by imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and future criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties with conditions not to tamper with evidence, cooperate in trial, and avoid further crimes.

Ravi Vs State of Up — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23828 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ravi Opposite Party :- State Of Up Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Verma,Dhirendra Singh

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.

¶6

Heard Mr. Dhirendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. C.L. Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶7

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive.It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the the alleged recovery of country made pistols, cartridges and other equipments are false, fabricated and planted. In fact, no such recovery was effected from the possession of the applicant. The applicant has no concerned with the alleged recovery. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that there is a criminal history of six cases against the applicant, out of which in two cases, the applicant has been acquitted, in one case final report has been submitted and in other three cases, the applicant is on bail. It is next contended that there are no chances of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the prosecution evidence.The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.04.2019. In case, the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Having considered the submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Ravi, involved in case crime No. 97 of 2019, under section 5/25 of Arms Act, PS Chandausi, district Sambhal, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 8.7.2019 Sazia

Ravi v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rocky Alias Ashwini Vs State of U.P.

Bavruddin Vs State of U.P.

Satya Dev Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Ram Singh Vs State of U.P.

Dilshad Vs State of U.P.

Shahid @ Bala Ji Vs State of U.P.