Rahul v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed withdrawal of criminal bail application with liberty to file fresh one due to change in charges.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of bail application allowed with liberty to file fresh one under relevant sections.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Crl. Misc. Withdrawal Application No.2 of 2019 In/And
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23458 of 2019
Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Varun Kumar Srivastava,Anil Srivastava Senior Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Varun Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Prashant Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This withdrawal application has been filed stating therein that initially the bail application was filed under Section 332, 395, 412 I.P.C. whereas subsequent charge sheet has come under Sections 332, 392, 411 I.P.C. Accordingly, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file a fresh one under relevant sections.
The application is allowed.
The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 Anand Sri./-
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul
Coram
Manju Rani Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/23458/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court