Manish v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous after the applicant's acquittal by the Sessions Court in the underlying case.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous after the applicant's acquittal by the Sessions Court in the underlying case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21505 of 2019
Applicant :- Manish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Kanojia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that accused/applicant has been acquitted in this case by the Sessions Court. Therefore, this bail application become infructuous and may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.7.2019 AKT
Manish
Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Other Judge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court