Dismissed
Rahul Chandra v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/21097/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court dismissed bail application held infructuous due to efflux of time and lack of appearance.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21097 of 2017
¶3
Applicant :- Rahul Chandra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Naveen Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kamlesh Misra
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2017. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶7
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶8
Order Date :- 10.7.2019 KA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rahul Chandra
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/21097/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court