Allowed

Akash @ Kallan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Jan 2019BAIL/2054/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application allowed the relief of enlarging Akash @ Kalkal on bail for charges under U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, subject to strict conditions regarding trial attendance and bond execution.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties of Rs. Two Lacs each, subject to specified conditions regarding trial attendance and prohibition of adjournments.

Akash @ Kallan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2054 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Akash @ Kalkal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant, is permitted to make necessary corrections in the memo of the application.

¶6

Heard Sri Dheeraj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that seven cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart, the said fact has been mentioned in para 7 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court, the said fact has been mentioned in para 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is further submitted that criminal history of the applicant has properly been explained in para 15 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. The applicant is in jail since 02.07.2018.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 evidence complicity of the accused severity of punishment and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶10

Let the applicant- Akash @ Kalkal involved in Case Crime No. 399 of 2018, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Niwari, District Ghaziabad be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties (Rs. Two Lacs each) (One should be of a family member) , each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence

¶12

when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 16.1.2019 Arti

Akash @ Kallan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash @ Kallan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Vs State of U.P.

Prashant Vs State of U.P.

Jahangir Alam Vs State of U.P.

Arshad Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vicku Pachauari Vs State of U.P.