Allowed

Ashutosh Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 May 2019BAIL/19405/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application where the applicant sought release under Section 489B, 489C IPC. The High Court allowed the application, directing release on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions against tampering, intimidation, and fuging.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions: no tampering, no criminal activity, no intimidation of witnesses, and regular appearance in court.

Ashutosh Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19405 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.D. Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

¶5

By means of this application the applicant Ashutosh Kumar Verma has prayed to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 217 of 2019, u/s 489B, 489C I.P.C., P.S. Handia, District Prayagraj.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA representing the State. Perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number, whereas the recovered motorcycle was with registered ownership of the applicant and registration certificate of which has been filed along with bail application. The recovered 28 notes of Rs. 500/- from the possession of the applicant were found to be real notes, as has been written in the recovery memo. He is of no criminal antecedent. There is no likelihood of applicant's fleeing from course of justice or tempering with evidence in case he is released on bail. Hence bail has been prayed for during trial.

¶8

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application..

¶9

Under all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail with certain conditions.

¶10

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶11

Let the applicant, Ashutosh Kumar Verma, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:

¶12

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶13

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶14

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution

¶15

witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶16

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶17

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 8.5.2019

¶19

Pcl

Ashutosh Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashutosh Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Vs State of U.P.

Aourangjeb Vs State of U.P.

Anuj Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Patel Vs State of U.P.

Kuber Vs State of U.P.

Naveen @ Navee Khan Vs State of U.P.