Rashid Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 44

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1913 of 2019

Applicant :- Rashid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tapan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

Argument on behalf of the applicant has been extended to the effect that in this case, applicant is not named in the FIR. He further submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant has no role to play in the commission of the offence. The police has planted false recovery against the applicant. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Factum of recovery has not been supported by any independent public witness. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 2.10.2018 in the present case.

¶7

The learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Considering the rival submissions and the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant- Rashid- involved in case crime

¶10

no.1430 of 2018, under Sections 392, 411 IPC, Police Station Murad Nagar, district Ghaziabad be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶11

Order Date :- 16.1.2019

¶12

Raj

Rashid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rashid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Sohan Lal Vs State of U.P.

Nitesh Rajput Vs State of U.P.

Harishankar Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Srivastva Vs State of U.P.

Wajid Husain Vs State of U.P.