Allowed

Dinesh Dhyani v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 May 2019BAIL/18800/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allows a bail application filed by Dinesh Dhyani, an accused in a cheating and forgery case. The court, noting he is not required for investigation and co-accused were on bail, granted bail subject to strict conditions regarding court attendance and avoiding adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each, subject to conditions.

Dinesh Dhyani Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18800 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Dinesh Dhyani Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shashank Singh,Mahendra Bahadur Singh

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

By means of this application, the applicant Dinesh Dhyani, who is involved in Case Crime No. 0296 of 2015, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Firozabad North, District Firozabad, is seeking enlargement on bail.

¶8

It has been submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number. He is languishing in jail since 19th October, 2018, whereas co-accused Lokendra Pratap with same accusation has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 07.01.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27038 of 2017. The offence is exclusively triable by Magistrate-Ist Class. The alleged criminal history has been duly explained. Hence bail has been prayed for.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail by referring criminal history of the accused-applicant.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions and looking to the fact that the applicant is no more required for the investigation purposes and further the trial will take time in its completion, I am inclined to grant this application for bail. Accordingly, the same is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Dinesh Dhyani , involved in Case Crime No. 0296 of 2015, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Firozabad North, District Firozabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶12

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he

¶13

shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

Order Date :- 16.5.2019 NS

Dinesh Dhyani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Dhyani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Ramji Turha Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Vimlesh Vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Dhyani Vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Dhyani Vs State of U.P.

Paras Rajbhar Vs State of U.P.