Allowed

Rahul v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2019BAIL/17579/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application was allowed. The court released the applicant on bail subject to furnishing a bond, sureties, and undertaking, with conditions prohibiting tampering with evidence, cooperation with trial, and no further criminal activities. The trial court was directed to conclude the trial within one year.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with personal bond, two sureties, and undertaking subject to conditions of no tampering, cooperation, and no criminal activities.

Rahul Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17579 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shashi Dhar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit has been filed by learned counsel for the applicant, is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.

¶7

Accused-applicant, involved in Case Crime No.203 of 2018, under Section 21/22 N.D.P.S Act, Police Station G.R.P. Tundla, District Firozabad, applied for bail.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Alleged recovery is false and fake. It is further submitted that mandatory provision of N.D.P.S. Act has not been complied with at the time of alleged recovery. No public witness was taken at the time of recovery. Applicant is in jail since 3.11.2018. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that applicant has been arrested with the possession of 250 gram alprazolem for which he had no valid license.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, rival contention of learned counsel for the parties, detention of applicant in jail, severity of punishment in case of conviction, alleged recovery from the possession of the accused-applicant and without commenting upon the merit of the case, applicant deserves bail.

¶11

Accordingly, bail application is allowed .

¶12

Let applicant Rahul be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties and filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶13

The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶14

The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.

¶15

During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities or case.

¶16

In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶17

However, it is provided that Trial Court shall expedite and conclude the trial within one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 24.9.2019 Manoj

Rahul v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Singh @ Joti Vs State of U.P.

Kapil @ Sintu Vs State of U.P.

Ranjay Kumar Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Pankaj Gihar Vs State of U.P.

Jubair Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Aqil @ Maula Vs State of U.P.