Allowed

Jubair Ahamad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jul 2019BAIL/17513/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to Jubair Ahamad in an NDPS case involving alleged recovery of ganja. The applicant claimed false recovery and non-compliance with evidence procedures. The court recognized submission regarding procedural lapses but issued bail with stringent conditions to prevent tampering.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Jubair Ahamad Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17513 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Jubair Ahamad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurodh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Anurodh Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Umesh Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that 2 kg. Ganja is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. In fact no such recovery was effected from the applicant. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery is false, concocted and planted. It is next submitted that since such recovery is not supported by independent witness, possibility of his false implication in the crime cannot be ruled out. It is next contended that in the present case the prosecution has failed to follow strictly the provisions of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It is also argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and victimize him. Criminal history of the applicant has properly been explained in para 9 of the affidavit accompanying the Bail Application. Applicant is languishing in jail since 28.02.2019. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve

¶8

any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant-Jubair Ahamad, involved in Case Crime No.28 of 2019 under Section 8/20 Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Police Station-Obra, District-Sonbhadra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

It may be observed that in the event of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed for the cancellation of applicant's bail.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.7.2019

¶15

Pr/-

Jubair Ahamad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jubair Ahamad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Singh Vs State of U.P.

Deen Dayal Vs State of U.P.

Amarjeet Patel Vs State of U.P.

Guddu Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Ravindra Vs State of U.P.

Rizwan Vs State of U.P.