Hon'ble Court rejected the bail application of Virendra Kumar in a murder (IPC 302) and 498A case. The court found no case made out for bail given the gravity of offences and severity of punishment.
Bail application rejected; applicant remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15104 of 2019
Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 261 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 316, 302 IPC, Police Station Barsana, District Mathura with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Perusal of the record shows that the applicant is the husband; the cause of death is burn injuries; there is dying declaration on record at this stage.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., perusing the averments as contained in the present bail application and looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected at this stage.
Order Date :- 24.7.2019 Kuldeep
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of murder and 498A IPC.
Virendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Vipin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
