Learned counsel for the applicant contends that applicant has been falsely implicated under Section 306, 201, IPC for death of wife of his brother; that as per averments made in FIR lodged by Raghunandan on 21.8.2018, his daughter Seema was married to applicant's brother Ramu in the year 2009 and on 21.8.2018 after committing her death her body was cremated by performing funeral and when first informant reached the spot at 4.00 p.m. on 21.8.2018, he found burning pyre and none of family members was present; that entire prosecution story is absolutely false; that applicant had no motive to cause death of his brother’s wife and neither he treated her with cruelty nor committed her death nor made any evidence disappear; that real fact is that there were differences between deceased and her husband and deceased, who was a lady of bad character and short temper used to have long talks with several persons and her husband used to doubt her character; that due to suspicion of her husband over her character, deceased appears to have committed suicide by hanging herself and cremation of her body was done; that applicant being Jeth of deceased has no concern; that independent witnesses have also stated that on account of suspicion over her character and her long talks on mobile phone with several persons at one time her husband had broken her mobile phone whereafter she was living under depression; that case of the applicant is distinguishable with Ramu, husband of the deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 14.9.2018.