Dismissed
Baliram @ Balli v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/10731/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application dismissed as rendered infructuous due to efflux of time and non-appearance, being pending since 2015.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10731 of 2015
¶3
Applicant :- Baliram @ Balli Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2015. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶6
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶7
Order Date :- 16.7.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Baliram @ Balli
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/10731/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court