Fateh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10453 of 2018
Applicant :- Fateh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Mishra,Harish Chandra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,A.C.Srivastava,Kandarp Srivastava,Kaustubh Srivastava
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Kaustubh Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 617 of 2017, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, Police Station Lisadigate, District Meerut with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Perusal of the record shows that though the applicant has not been named in the FIR, however, in view of the confessional statement and in view of the recovery as shown, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Moreover, looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected at this stage.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 Kuldeep
Fateh
Vipin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court