The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an interim maintenance order passed under the DV Act. The court held the proceedings did not constitute abuse of process of court.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed; no interference allowed to quash the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9174 of 2019
Applicant :- Rajendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anita Singh,Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
support of his contention.
Order Date :- 15.3.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pending domestic violence proceedings constitute abuse of process of court justifying quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajendra
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
