The applicant did not appear in despite repeated calls and no request for adjournment. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order stands vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7353 of 2011
Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 13.12.2019
Sanjeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar Sharma
State Of U.P.
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
