The application was dismissed as the applicant was absent, raising an inference of lack of interest or that the proceedings had reached their logical end, rendering the application infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6828 of 2005
Applicant :- Udai Veer Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Vashisth Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Negmendra Shukla
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the heading of 'final disposal' and is assigned to this Court by Hon'ble the Chief Justice as the matter is of the category of 'old cases' of the year 2005.
Even in the revised call, nobody is present to press the application.
It appears that the applicant is no more interest in pursuing the matter or the proceedings under challenge might have reached to its logical end and application is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed.
Consigned to record.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 2.1.2019 IrfanUddin
Udai Veer Singh
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
