The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear despite repeated calls, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the remedy.
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6101 of 2019
Applicant :- Kalpana Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh,Gyanendra Kumar Gyani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhanu Prakash Verma
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
On the matter being taken up today, no one appears on behalf of the applicant despite repeated calls.
It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing her legal remedy.
The instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 15.5.2019 rkg
Kalpana Singh
State Of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
