Court dismissed an application under Section 482 for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear after repeated calls. Summons were issued, representing a dismissal of the proceedings before this court.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6040 of 2011
Applicant :- Sarmesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the applicant in spite of repeated calls. There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant. The application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Office to communicate this order to the Court below within a week.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 safi
Sarmesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
