Ashok Kumar Saxena v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed by the Hon'ble Court as the matter was old and pending since 2005, deemed infructuous with efflux of time, and no counsel appeared to press it.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time and non-appearance of counsel.