The Hon'ble Court dismissed an application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution as the applicants failed to appear despite repeated calls and no adjournment request.
Application dismissed for lack of appearance; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32250 of 2016
Applicant :- Chhotu And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Srivastava,Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hari Pratap Gupta
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Sri Vinay Kumar, holding brief of Sri Hari Pratap Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019
ss
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chhotu And 4 Others
Om Prakash-VII
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
