Order dated 5.12.2019 in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution as the applicants' counsel failed to appear despite repeated calls and no adjournment was sought.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2976 of 2011
Applicant :- Jamil And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 5.12.2019
ss
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jamil And Others
Om Prakash-VII,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
