Dismissed

Yameen and 5 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2019A482/27348/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings and a summons order was dismissed as no illegality was made out. The court directed surrender within 30 days for bail consideration with a stay on coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash proceedings refused; 30 days stay on coercive action granted pending surrender and bail application.

Yameen and 5 Others Vs State of Up and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27348 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Yameen And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

¶5

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 4847 of 2018 under Sections 354, 452, 504, 506, 392 IPC, Police Station Tanda, District - Rampur pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Rampur as well as summoning order dated 26.4.2019 passed by the court concerned. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the complaint was filed on the basis of false facts and also on the basis of malice. It is further submitted that from the version of the complaint as well as statement of witnesses, offence under the aforesaid Sections is not made out against the applicants. General allegations have been made in the complaint. The impugned order suffers from illegality and infirmity.

¶8

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicants have been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

¶9

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicants. Further, the plea raised before this Court would require leading of evidence, which can be raised before the court concerned at the appropriate Stage. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants prays that a direction may be issued to the court below for expeditious disposal of the bail application of the applicants.

¶11

Hence, it is directed that in case the applicants surrender before the court below and apply for bail within 30 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶12

It is made clear that no further time shall be allowed to the applicants for surrender before the court concerned.

¶13

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 25.7.2019 ss

Yameen and 5 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yameen and 5 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Vs State of U.P.

Naiem and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Uma Shankar Dubey Alias Loha Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Onkar Nath Pathak and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Pal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmendra Vs State of U.P. and Another