In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the court examined the merits of quashing N.D.P.S. proceedings initiated via a recovery warrant. Finding no good grounds to set aside the impugned order, the application was dismissed.
The entire criminal proceedings initiating against the applicant via the recovery warrant were denied quashing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23683 of 2019
Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaiya Ram Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Bhaiya Ram Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. on behalf of State.
The applicant by means of this application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings initiating against the applicant in pursuance of recovery warrant dated 03.05.2019 issued by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. Court No. 2, Mainpuri in Session Trial No. 15 of 2013 (State Vs. Bakse Khan) arising out of Case Crime No. 55 of 2013, under section 18/20 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Allau, District Mainpuri.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and after perusing the order impugned as well as material on record, this court is of the opinion that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any good ground which may warrant interference by this Court for setting aside the order impugned.
This application lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.7.2019 Arti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. warrants quashing the recovery warrant and criminal proceedings in the N.D.P.S. case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Chandra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
