Santosh Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, resulting in the vacation of any interim order.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, resulting in the vacation of any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22675 of 2019
Applicant :- Santosh Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Raghvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 Sanjeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Singh
State Of U.P.
Anr
Om Prakash-VII,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court