Dismissed

Ravi Alias Matu v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Jul 2019A482/21667/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that no prima-facie case of illegality existed to quash proceedings under Section 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. The application was refused, but the applicant was directed to surrender and apply for bail within 30 days to ensure expeditious disposal.

What did the court decide?

Rejected quash plea; directed summary disposal of bail application if applicant surrenders and applies within 30 days without coercive action.

Ravi Alias Matu Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21667 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ravi Alias Matu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kuamr Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

¶5

The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 4968 of 2018 (Smt. Monika @ Mona Vs. Ravi @ Matu), under Section 406 IPC, Police Station Muradnagar, District Ghaziabad arising out of summoning order dated 3.11.2018 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Ghaziabad. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

¶7

Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is husband of the opposite party no. 2. Other matrimonial dispute under Section 498-A IPC have also been started by the opposite party no. 2 which is pending and the same was referred to Mediatioin and Conciliation Centrebut no settlement has been arrived at between the parties. Offences levelled against the applicant in the present matter is false.

¶8

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicant has been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

¶9

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicant. Further, the plea raised before this Court would require leading of evidence, which can be raised before the court concerned at the appropriate Stage. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant prays that a direction may be issued to the court below for expeditious disposal of the bail application of the applicant.

¶11

Hence, it is directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the court below and applies for bail within 30 days from today the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken/given effect to against the applicant. It is made clear that no further time will be allowed to the applicant for surrender before the court concerned.

¶12

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 9.7.2019

¶13

Sachdeva

Ravi Alias Matu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Alias Matu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Irfan and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mairaj Quraishi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Pradeep and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aslam @ Mohd. Aslam and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shyam Yadav Vs State of Up and 5 Others

Satya Prakash and 4 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Another