Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution since the applicants did not appear despite repeated calls without seeking an adjournment, resulting in the vacation of the interim order.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19792 of 2012
Applicant :- Baboo Ram And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.K. Singh,Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Madan Singh
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Sri Madan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019
ss
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baboo Ram And Others
State of U.P.
Another
Om Prakash-VII,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
